Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 03:11
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Just in the last 5 years:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What are some difficulties in a JEE aspirant's life?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Thank you.
Summer Game Fest Viewership Jumps 89% to Record 50 Million Livestreams - Variety
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Asia stocks buoyed by tech gains; trade, economic uncertainty persists - Investing.com
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
3 keys to success every Citadel intern learns their first week on the job - Business Insider
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Low-carb diets linked to reduced depression symptoms — but there’s a catch - PsyPost
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What are LGBT+ people tired of hearing?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
How do you deal with neighbors who are always telling you what to do?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.